Climate transition risk raises bank funding costs in repo market
BIS Paper Auf Deutsch lesen

Climate transition risk raises bank funding costs in repo market

A new ECB working paper reveals that banks with higher exposure to climate transition risk face significantly elevated borrowing costs in the interbank repo market. This premium intensifies during financial stress and affects monetary policy transmission.

Carbon premium in short-term funding

Banks with greater exposure to climate transition risk, measured by their financed emissions, consistently incur higher borrowing costs in the European repo market.

A one standard deviation increase in financed emissions leads to repo rates that are 7–12 percent higher on average.

This 'carbon premium' is a combination of a genuine risk premium, compensating lenders for increased credit risk, and an 'inconvenience premium,' reflecting the sustainability preferences of dealer banks.

The study utilized transaction-level data from 2019–2022, combining repo borrowing information with banks' financed greenhouse gas emissions to establish this link.

Amplified risks, uneven policy transmission

The carbon premium in repo rates significantly amplifies during periods of market stress, tripling in size.

This interaction suggests that climate risks heighten existing financial vulnerabilities, contributing to systemic risk.

Transition risks also alter monetary policy transmission: borrowing rates for 'brown' banks (those with high financed emissions) adjust approximately 7 percent faster to new policy rates during hikes than for 'green' banks.

This indicates an uneven pass-through of central bank policy across the banking sector, potentially hindering the effectiveness of monetary policy measures.

Beyond greenwashing: Real costs emerge

This study provides crucial empirical evidence that climate risks are already impacting core financial markets, moving beyond theoretical discussions.

The identified 'inconvenience premium' shows sustainability preferences translating into tangible funding costs, a significant development for market dynamics.

Policymakers must now integrate these findings into systemic risk assessments and address the uneven effects on monetary policy transmission.

Source: Climate change, bank liquidity and systemic risk

IN: