Cook reflects on financial stability and Fed's analytical framework
BIS Speech Auf Deutsch lesen

Cook reflects on financial stability and Fed's analytical framework

Federal Reserve Governor Lisa D Cook reflected on financial stability policy and the Fed's analytical tools in a speech at Yale University. She discussed the Committee on Financial Stability, the Financial Stability Report, and scenario analysis.

A decade of financial stability focus

Governor Lisa D Cook reflected on her four years as chair of the Federal Reserve Board's Committee on Financial Stability, established in 2014 following the Global Financial Crisis.

The committee integrates insights from economists, market experts, bank supervisors, and payment system experts across the Federal Reserve System.

Cook honored the committee's first chair, Stanley Fischer, who emphasized the importance of a dedicated forum for policymakers to discuss financial stability issues.

Fischer notably highlighted the migration of activities to nonbank intermediaries and the systemic risks posed by data gaps in these areas.

Cook affirmed ongoing efforts to better understand these issues and improve financial stability monitoring, stressing the need for consistent focus on potential severe shocks and the resilience of financial markets, even during periods of calm.

Beyond known unknowns: Scenario analysis and the FSR

The Financial Stability Report (FSR), introduced by Chair Powell in 2018, provides transparency into the Fed's monitoring of financial stability.

It tracks four key vulnerabilities: asset valuations, borrowing by businesses and households, financial sector leverage, and funding risk.

Cook highlighted the FSR's 'rainbow chart,' which shows rapid growth in bank lending commitments to nonbank financial institutions, offering insights into evolving private credit.

She then discussed scenario analysis, contrasting it with supervisory stress tests.

While stress tests focus on 'known unknowns' with precision, financial stability scenario analysis explores unprecedented, plausible shocks, like an AI disappointment.

This method assesses second-round effects and interconnections across markets, acknowledging inherent uncertainty and seeking signposts to validate assessments under stress.

Vigilance in a complex world

Policymaking for financial stability is inherently complex, often dealing with scenarios that models cannot fully capture.

While public attention can wane during calm periods, the lessons from past crises underscore the critical need for continuous vigilance.

The ongoing work of the Committee and the FSR ensures that potential tail risks are never truly out of sight.

Source: Lisa D Cook: Reflections on financial stability

IN: