Below-market mortgage rates curb household mobility by 17 percent
BIS Paper

Below-market mortgage rates curb household mobility by 17 percent

A review of economic literature by Federal Reserve researchers shows that below-market mortgage rates reduced US household mobility by up to 17 percent post-2021. The paper evaluates key market distortions alongside potential policy remedies such as mortgage portability and Danish-style options.

Chilled mobility and elevated price tags

Following rapid monetary tightening in 2022, over 80 percent of outstanding U.S. 30-year fixed-rate mortgages held interest rates at least two percentage points below prevailing market rates, remaining above 45 percent through 2025.

This rate gap created significant lock-in effects, reducing overall household mobility by 16 to 17 percent between 2022 and 2023.

Beyond household relocations, the reduction in housing supply raised transacted house prices by 5 to 10 percent on average, with price impacts reaching 22.6 percent in supply-inelastic superstar cities.

The literature demonstrates that locked-in homeowners avoid downsizing and own-to-rent transitions, contracting the pool of available properties for sale and spilling over into rental markets where asking rents increased by 0.35 percent for every one percent expansion in the local mortgage payment gap.

From Danish options to portable loans

To resolve lock-in frictions, researchers evaluate three principal mortgage contract modifications.

Mortgage portability allows borrowers to transfer existing low-rate loans to new properties, though it increases loan extension risk for investors.

Broadening loan assumability enables buyers to acquire seller mortgages, but requires high down payments and lender approval.

Alternatively, adopting Denmark's delivery option permits homeowners to repurchase loans at market value when interest rates rise, eliminating lock-in incentives at an estimated initial borrowing cost of 20 basis points.

Pragmatic fixes require structural courage

This comprehensive survey rightly identifies structural mortgage design as the primary culprit behind severe housing market paralysis.

However, proposing complex Danish delivery options overlooks the political and operational inertia of U.S. secondary mortgage markets.

Until regulators mandate standardized loan portability, American housing liquidity will remain hostage to future rate cycles.

Source: Mortgage Lock-in: A Review of the Literature

IN: