Bowman advocates for risk-aligned bank capital rules
Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle W. Bowman outlined proposals to modernize bank capital requirements, emphasizing a risk-aligned approach to support the real economy. Speaking at the Cato Institute, Bowman detailed upcoming rules for Basel III implementation in the United States.
Aligning capital with actual risk
Bowman stated that the Federal Reserve, in coordination with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, will propose rules to implement the final phase of Basel III. These changes aim to eliminate overlapping requirements, right-size calibrations to actual risk, and comprehensively address long-standing gaps, resulting in more efficient regulation.
The approach evaluates each requirement on its merits, ensuring proper calibration and avoiding unintended outcomes.
The modernization effort focuses on four pillars for the largest banks: stress testing, the supplementary leverage ratio (eSLR), risk-based capital requirements under Basel III, and the G-SIB surcharge.
The goal is to preserve safety and soundness while better positioning banks to support economic growth and provide credit to households and businesses.
Beyond excessive capital burdens
Bowman highlighted that while post-2008 reforms substantially increased bank capital, experience shows requirements that overly calibrate low-risk activities produce unintended consequences.
These include constraining credit availability, pushing activity into the less-regulated nonbank sector, and increasing complexity without meaningfully enhancing safety and soundness.
She cited the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) surcharge as an example, which has increased in a way that has become disassociated from actual risk.
The new proposals aim to reduce incentives for activities like mortgage origination and lending to businesses to migrate outside the regulated banking sector, ensuring robust capital standards for all U.S. banks.
A pragmatic shift for bank oversight
Bowman's speech signals a pragmatic shift in regulatory philosophy, moving away from blanket capital increases towards a more nuanced, risk-sensitive approach.
This focus on the 'real economy' acknowledges past unintended consequences of over-regulation, potentially fostering better credit flow.
However, the challenge lies in balancing this flexibility with maintaining robust financial stability, especially for the largest institutions.
Source: Bowman, Capital Rules for the Real Economy
IN: