AI-sector episodes weigh most on UK financial return asymmetry
BOC Paper

AI-sector episodes weigh most on UK financial return asymmetry

AI-sector scenarios make the largest contribution to downside asymmetry in UK financial returns, but little in Canada. A Bank of Canada staff paper published October 16, 2026, finds financial-sector-specific scenarios dominate extreme returns across five markets.

Five markets, different tail exposures

Javier Ojea-Ferreiro, Andrea Ugolini and Juan C. Reboredo find financial-sector-specific scenarios dominate both return tails in all five markets.

In the United Kingdom, AI-sector scenarios account for 22.6 percent of downside expected shortfall versus 15.9 percent on the upside.

Their skewness contribution is -0.052, the largest negative contribution there, versus -0.026 in Europe, -0.035 in China and -0.001 in Canada.

In the United States, AI-sector scenarios have the smallest weight, approximately 7 percent of each tail.

China alone has positive average skewness, at 0.021, driven by financial and systemic scenarios rather than AI-sector outcomes.

Financial and systemic scenarios dominate downside asymmetry in Canada and the United States.

Four scenarios separate concurrent exposures

Daily local-currency equity returns span December 9, 2021, to December 2025.

The authors proxy AI exposure with the WisdomTree Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Fund and construct real-economy indices excluding financial and AI firms.

They decompose expected shortfall and a tail-sensitive skewness index into financial-only, AI-sector, macroeconomic and joint systemic scenarios.

Results cover the lowest and highest 5 percent of conditional returns.

The framework starts with financial extremes and identifies concurrent market conditions.

Association is not causation

The authors present the framework as a market-based complement to reverse stress testing.

It measures perceived AI exposure, not firms' adoption or operational incidents, and does not establish causality.

They conclude that AI-related vulnerabilities require assessment alongside macroeconomic conditions.

Source: Artificial Intelligence and Financial Tail Risks

IN:

Report an error